appreciate the use of fiverr voice talents too... I'd have probably done an inferior Mel Blanc impression and mangled all the voices myself in the best Monty Python women's-voice style.
I know! I have followed Jon for years. My brother got injected so whatever he had, went to me. Had that funky pickly taste thing in my mouth and malaise. So they are making something, just not what they say it is. It was a Trojan horse designed to get the masses to get injecticided. Thanks for sharing in the awakening, God bless and "stay sane inside insanity" like my pen pal Kristine used to say!
Yes, we need to shake down those deep-pocketed superpredators, to compensate the victims. When I was in the hospital for respiratory conditions, they actually offered me remdesivir THREE TIMES but thank God I read!! Yes, a doctor in something that looked like a beekeeper's suit was asking that. I had contracted COVID from my visiting brother (who never told me he had it until he was back home in WI). My parody on Fauci was "Clotting Shot Fauci Coup" to the song "Rock and Roll Hoochie Koo." So there's another potential chart-topper! Have a warm week and remember, every day and life is a miracle of God!!
Covid does not exist. Read Jon Rappoport's most recent blog.
Arguing against the existence of SARS-CoV-2
Jon Rappoport
14 hr ago
I’ve done that many times.
Here I want to examine the claim that “the hypothesis of a virus best explains the facts at hand.”
People can’t get it through their heads that “a hypothesis that explains” isn’t science. It’s just a thought, an idea, a possibility, a first step on a long road.
A scientist says, “You know, when I make a map of all the planets in our solar system, and I show their orbits, and I factor in the effects of gravity—when I look at all these facts—I think there is another planet we haven’t found yet. That’s my hypothesis which explains the facts.”
Starting point. That’s all.
NOW the scientist has to do one of two things. Either FIND that planet by direct observation; or if he can’t, devise an experiment which PREDICTS something he can observe, based on his hypothesis that there is another planet in the solar system.
What he predicts has to be specific, a specific event that occurs during a specific time period.
That would be science.
The value of a hypothesis is its contribution to a prediction.
Its value isn’t its explanation of a set of facts.
Many hypotheses can explain the same set of facts.
The hypothesis of a virus, SARS-CoV-2, hasn’t led to any significant SPECIFIC predictions, such as: “a cluster of at least a thousand cases in these 3 towns in Southern Ohio between October and December.”
And there is another problem—what ARE the true facts the virus-hypothesis is “explaining?”
When it comes to COVID, the basic facts would be case numbers and death numbers.
A case, according to ridiculous medical practice (not theory), means a positive PCR test. That’s all. No clinical symptoms are necessary. And the PCR assumes (without proof) that the genetic segment it is looking for belongs to SARS-CoV-2 (the hypothetical virus). Further, the sensitivity of the PCR can be adjusted, and at high sensitivity it will register positive on a few tiny genetic fragments of god-knows-what. Labs DO set the sensitivity of the PCR at a very high level.
Therefore, reported numbers of COVID cases mean nothing.
When it comes to numbers of COVID deaths, the true facts are a jungle of lies. Here are some of them:
ONE: A doctor arbitrarily and falsely writes “COVID” on the death certificate of a patient. This practice is widespread.
TWO: Since the symptoms of “COVID” are indistinguishable from the symptoms of flu and pneumonia (lung congestion, fever, chills, fatigue, muscle weakness), there is no reason to infer a patient died of “COVID” rather than flu or pneumonia. That’s huge. Plus, in China, Italy, Spain, and other places, high levels of poisonous air pollution cause the illness and death of many people who develop lung problems and are diagnosed with “COVID.” (The remarkable Jim West (see here) has done groundbreaking work in this area.)
THREE: So-called COVID deaths are mainly recorded in elderly persons, who already have multiple serious health conditions, caused in part by years of dosing with toxic pharmaceuticals. These elderly people, their immune systems already in dire straits, are terrified by the prospect of being diagnosed with “COVID.” Then they ARE diagnosed. On top of that, they’re isolated and cut off from contact with family and friends. They give up, fold up, and die.
FOUR: Many of these elderly patients (and the non-elderly) are sedated with powerful opioids or other strong destructive sedatives and put on breathing ventilators (intubation) for long periods of time. This treatment IS a killer. In a study of patients in the NY Northwell Hospital system, 97.2% of patients over the age of 65 who were put on ventilators died.
FIVE: Remdesivir, a drug frequently used to treat “COVID” patients, is highly toxic.
I’ll stop there. With these facts in hand, as you can see, there is no reason to assume SARS-CoV-2 exists or is doing harm.
You don’t need the hypothesis of a virus to explain these ACTUAL facts.
What you need are honest prosecutors bringing massive criminal charges.
So that leaves only one scientific road for virus addicts. Proving SARS-CoV-2 exists by isolating it and observing it directly.
Forget “hypothesis that explains the facts.” Forget a specific prediction based on the hypothesis. You have to go to empirical seeing is believing.
And here, lab procedures fail miserably. Scientists claiming they’ve found SARS-CoV-2 are spinning fantasies. I’ve called this the story of the soup in a dish in a lab.
For a full-on refutation of those lab procedures, read my interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman (see here). He comments, blow by blow, on a typical published step by step lab “isolation” of SARS-CoV-2 and tears it to pieces.
There is another lab procedure that should have been done at the outset, as soon as the virus-hypothesis was floated in early 2020. It wasn’t done. I explained it then. It was my first foray into rejecting the “proof” that SARS-CoV-2 exists:
Take 500 people diagnosed with the so-called pandemic disease, the new disease. Take mucus samples from all the patients, and subject those samples to rigorous analysis, including centrifuging them, to obtain what you believe are specimens of the new virus. Photograph those specimens under an electron microscope. See whether you find MANY identical particles of a new virus in each photo from every patient, and see whether these particles are the same from photo to photo. (Open the door to a vigorous debate about what these particles in the photos actually are.)
Of course, this test of the 500 (5000 would have been better) patients was never done. There is a good reason why it wasn’t done.
Researchers saw a high risk of failure. I would have bet on failure.
“No new virus. We see some different particles here and there, that’s all. We haven’t established anything consistent from patient to patient. We’re dealing with traditional pneumonia and flu…we just need to live through it…as we always do…”
Several misguided people have pointed to a study here and a study there in which the authors claim to have found SARS-CoV-2 under the microscope, in a sample from one patient or a few patients. THAT’S NOT WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT.
I’m talking about the full study I just described. The FULL study. AND further confirmation or rejection by other groups of independent scientists repeating the procedure. Which is called science.
After all, think it through. Based on a lab claim about a new virus, if you’re going to lock down the planet and force an experimental genetic injection on the global population, and if you’re going to destroy economies…YOU’D BETTER CONFIRM THERE IS A NEW VIRUS WITH A FULL AND CORRECT STUDY, AS OPPOSED TO A FEW ANECDOTES.
Again, that full and correct study was never done.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists. And the burden of proof is on the scientists who claim they discovered the virus. People can claim anything. They can say they proved a purple man is walking on Jupiter. But he isn’t. I can claim the government sent me a check for 12 billion dollars. But you know that check doesn’t exist, unless and until I can prove it does. That’s how reality works.
Some demented person out there will say, “But…but you can’t absolutely prove that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.” A staggering revelation; I can’t prove a negative. That critic is a sad case. But he doesn’t deserve our sympathy. Next month, he might be appointed the new director of the CDC.
Masterful! I'm thinking you could have a sequel where the perps magically shuttle off to an underground base under the Denver International Airport, then Pfauci gets plowed down when a mural of The Grim Reaper mysteriously falls on him!! Plow on!!
that's an awesome production.
appreciate the use of fiverr voice talents too... I'd have probably done an inferior Mel Blanc impression and mangled all the voices myself in the best Monty Python women's-voice style.
Thanks much. Get the FREE PDF with links to all my music videos and original audio demos. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/add-ons-to-final-master-video-collection
I know! I have followed Jon for years. My brother got injected so whatever he had, went to me. Had that funky pickly taste thing in my mouth and malaise. So they are making something, just not what they say it is. It was a Trojan horse designed to get the masses to get injecticided. Thanks for sharing in the awakening, God bless and "stay sane inside insanity" like my pen pal Kristine used to say!
Yes, we need to shake down those deep-pocketed superpredators, to compensate the victims. When I was in the hospital for respiratory conditions, they actually offered me remdesivir THREE TIMES but thank God I read!! Yes, a doctor in something that looked like a beekeeper's suit was asking that. I had contracted COVID from my visiting brother (who never told me he had it until he was back home in WI). My parody on Fauci was "Clotting Shot Fauci Coup" to the song "Rock and Roll Hoochie Koo." So there's another potential chart-topper! Have a warm week and remember, every day and life is a miracle of God!!
Covid does not exist. Read Jon Rappoport's most recent blog.
Arguing against the existence of SARS-CoV-2
Jon Rappoport
14 hr ago
I’ve done that many times.
Here I want to examine the claim that “the hypothesis of a virus best explains the facts at hand.”
People can’t get it through their heads that “a hypothesis that explains” isn’t science. It’s just a thought, an idea, a possibility, a first step on a long road.
A scientist says, “You know, when I make a map of all the planets in our solar system, and I show their orbits, and I factor in the effects of gravity—when I look at all these facts—I think there is another planet we haven’t found yet. That’s my hypothesis which explains the facts.”
Starting point. That’s all.
NOW the scientist has to do one of two things. Either FIND that planet by direct observation; or if he can’t, devise an experiment which PREDICTS something he can observe, based on his hypothesis that there is another planet in the solar system.
What he predicts has to be specific, a specific event that occurs during a specific time period.
That would be science.
The value of a hypothesis is its contribution to a prediction.
Its value isn’t its explanation of a set of facts.
Many hypotheses can explain the same set of facts.
The hypothesis of a virus, SARS-CoV-2, hasn’t led to any significant SPECIFIC predictions, such as: “a cluster of at least a thousand cases in these 3 towns in Southern Ohio between October and December.”
And there is another problem—what ARE the true facts the virus-hypothesis is “explaining?”
When it comes to COVID, the basic facts would be case numbers and death numbers.
A case, according to ridiculous medical practice (not theory), means a positive PCR test. That’s all. No clinical symptoms are necessary. And the PCR assumes (without proof) that the genetic segment it is looking for belongs to SARS-CoV-2 (the hypothetical virus). Further, the sensitivity of the PCR can be adjusted, and at high sensitivity it will register positive on a few tiny genetic fragments of god-knows-what. Labs DO set the sensitivity of the PCR at a very high level.
Therefore, reported numbers of COVID cases mean nothing.
When it comes to numbers of COVID deaths, the true facts are a jungle of lies. Here are some of them:
ONE: A doctor arbitrarily and falsely writes “COVID” on the death certificate of a patient. This practice is widespread.
TWO: Since the symptoms of “COVID” are indistinguishable from the symptoms of flu and pneumonia (lung congestion, fever, chills, fatigue, muscle weakness), there is no reason to infer a patient died of “COVID” rather than flu or pneumonia. That’s huge. Plus, in China, Italy, Spain, and other places, high levels of poisonous air pollution cause the illness and death of many people who develop lung problems and are diagnosed with “COVID.” (The remarkable Jim West (see here) has done groundbreaking work in this area.)
THREE: So-called COVID deaths are mainly recorded in elderly persons, who already have multiple serious health conditions, caused in part by years of dosing with toxic pharmaceuticals. These elderly people, their immune systems already in dire straits, are terrified by the prospect of being diagnosed with “COVID.” Then they ARE diagnosed. On top of that, they’re isolated and cut off from contact with family and friends. They give up, fold up, and die.
FOUR: Many of these elderly patients (and the non-elderly) are sedated with powerful opioids or other strong destructive sedatives and put on breathing ventilators (intubation) for long periods of time. This treatment IS a killer. In a study of patients in the NY Northwell Hospital system, 97.2% of patients over the age of 65 who were put on ventilators died.
FIVE: Remdesivir, a drug frequently used to treat “COVID” patients, is highly toxic.
I’ll stop there. With these facts in hand, as you can see, there is no reason to assume SARS-CoV-2 exists or is doing harm.
You don’t need the hypothesis of a virus to explain these ACTUAL facts.
What you need are honest prosecutors bringing massive criminal charges.
So that leaves only one scientific road for virus addicts. Proving SARS-CoV-2 exists by isolating it and observing it directly.
Forget “hypothesis that explains the facts.” Forget a specific prediction based on the hypothesis. You have to go to empirical seeing is believing.
And here, lab procedures fail miserably. Scientists claiming they’ve found SARS-CoV-2 are spinning fantasies. I’ve called this the story of the soup in a dish in a lab.
For a full-on refutation of those lab procedures, read my interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman (see here). He comments, blow by blow, on a typical published step by step lab “isolation” of SARS-CoV-2 and tears it to pieces.
There is another lab procedure that should have been done at the outset, as soon as the virus-hypothesis was floated in early 2020. It wasn’t done. I explained it then. It was my first foray into rejecting the “proof” that SARS-CoV-2 exists:
Take 500 people diagnosed with the so-called pandemic disease, the new disease. Take mucus samples from all the patients, and subject those samples to rigorous analysis, including centrifuging them, to obtain what you believe are specimens of the new virus. Photograph those specimens under an electron microscope. See whether you find MANY identical particles of a new virus in each photo from every patient, and see whether these particles are the same from photo to photo. (Open the door to a vigorous debate about what these particles in the photos actually are.)
Of course, this test of the 500 (5000 would have been better) patients was never done. There is a good reason why it wasn’t done.
Researchers saw a high risk of failure. I would have bet on failure.
“No new virus. We see some different particles here and there, that’s all. We haven’t established anything consistent from patient to patient. We’re dealing with traditional pneumonia and flu…we just need to live through it…as we always do…”
Several misguided people have pointed to a study here and a study there in which the authors claim to have found SARS-CoV-2 under the microscope, in a sample from one patient or a few patients. THAT’S NOT WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT.
I’m talking about the full study I just described. The FULL study. AND further confirmation or rejection by other groups of independent scientists repeating the procedure. Which is called science.
After all, think it through. Based on a lab claim about a new virus, if you’re going to lock down the planet and force an experimental genetic injection on the global population, and if you’re going to destroy economies…YOU’D BETTER CONFIRM THERE IS A NEW VIRUS WITH A FULL AND CORRECT STUDY, AS OPPOSED TO A FEW ANECDOTES.
Again, that full and correct study was never done.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists. And the burden of proof is on the scientists who claim they discovered the virus. People can claim anything. They can say they proved a purple man is walking on Jupiter. But he isn’t. I can claim the government sent me a check for 12 billion dollars. But you know that check doesn’t exist, unless and until I can prove it does. That’s how reality works.
Some demented person out there will say, “But…but you can’t absolutely prove that SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.” A staggering revelation; I can’t prove a negative. That critic is a sad case. But he doesn’t deserve our sympathy. Next month, he might be appointed the new director of the CDC.
-- Jon Rappoport
Masterful! I'm thinking you could have a sequel where the perps magically shuttle off to an underground base under the Denver International Airport, then Pfauci gets plowed down when a mural of The Grim Reaper mysteriously falls on him!! Plow on!!
Thanks. I want Pfauci to survive so he can face the music!
Thanks, Turfseer! Have just enjoyed the whole. I am of the generation which watched Twilight Zone weekly!