The “free love” hippie era of the 1960s-70s brought about a coming together of the people that opposed war and government corruption.
The hippies, youth and homosexual communities that were previously mocked and scorned were recognized as powerful, influential forces.
The powers that shouldn’t be theorized a supposed sexually transmitted phantom into existence to scapegoat as The blame for clusters of deaths occurring in a distinct subculture that practiced immune suppressive lifestyle factors.
Instead of recognizing the multiple assaults to immune function as the problem, blame was cast on the “free love”.
All the power and political influence that the coming together of the people produced was thwarted by widespread promotion of this supposedly sexually transmitted phantom driving division, distrust and fear instead of togetherness and free love.
All the Power Of The People was lost by allowing the fear driven, government promoted LIES of a sexually transmitted deadly phantom to divide We The People. Everyone became a potential deadly threat instead of a potential lover.
This method of psychological manipulation of the people has become increasingly more intense, varied and widespread.
EVERYTHING the government tells We The People is intended to cause division. Because what the government fears most is a coming together of We The People.
I sorta view things through the lens of a Transhumanist framework whereby these manipulated, emotion-driven issues of climate, AI, mRNA, and identity distortion are all the main pillars...
I listened to Pollyana Summer this morning and it threw me back in 2020. Yes, the groove has been cut. Now with AI at their beck and call it is just a matter of time when the algorithm says fire for effect.
Lewis, it is getting strangerer and strangerer. That is why The Third Wave by Toffler appears to have much to offer.
When it jumped into my hands and I saw what it laid out, it confirmed in me why all the words, all the sharing will not stop it.
We are now in a post word world because the info supersaturation has had its effect. We have convinced ourselves that this left index finger drill that I am tapping out in the dark on this stupid LED screen is real, and important and worth my effort to connect better with someone who shares an interest?, a belief?, a cause?, ...
Well all this may be correct, but in ten minutes it's over and the next online battle ensues.
This is Bugs Rabbit crazy living.
There is only one answer and if enough of humanity did this maybe we would stand a fighting chance.
Your Part 1 article on the Psychosomatic COVID which I just finished is part of the answer.
I had two mysterious events that now after your explanation seem like panic attacks.
My uncle suffered from epilepsy. I witnessed one in my grandma's kitchen and it shocked and then taught this 12 year old.
Thanks for this insightful commentary, which is manifestly true.
All people need to do toward freeing themselves of this tyranny founded on falsehood, is question and think. Be rational in other words.
That is one reason I often wonder about so-called health freedom advocates and lockdown-masking-vaccine critics who evidently cannot understand that viruses have no support in scientific evidence.
For instance, if I were to write on substack, as a full or part time pursuit, why would I restrict my commentary to repeated criticism of one policy issue for years on end? Why would I confine my writing to that One Issue, rehashing the same points over and over in varied ways, never attaining a breakthrough in new knowledge, and accompanied by many other writers repeating the same warmed over hash that half of Americans already get?
Why would I name my blog after That Single Issue, thereby limiting its appeal and reach? Hot Tea and Minimum Wage Laws. It is odd.
Exactly, Rider. The whole point of “health freedom” should be to pursue truth wherever it leads—not to fence off the discussion at the edge of virology just because it feels safer or more palatable. If the virus paradigm itself is false—and the evidence strongly points that way—then endlessly critiquing lockdowns, masks, or mandates without questioning the root premise is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
It’s telling how many anti-lockdown voices still cling to germ theory like a life raft, even while exposing every other lie. They’ll call out Fauci, Pfizer, even the PCR scam—yet stop short of asking, was there ever a virus to begin with? That question breaks the spell. That question makes it all make sense.
As for those blogs stuck on one narrow lane—they may wake a few normies, sure. But if we’re serious about dismantling the system, we’ve got to go deeper. It’s not about hot tea or minimum wage laws. It’s about the architecture of belief itself—and how it’s been weaponized.
The “free love” hippie era of the 1960s-70s brought about a coming together of the people that opposed war and government corruption.
The hippies, youth and homosexual communities that were previously mocked and scorned were recognized as powerful, influential forces.
The powers that shouldn’t be theorized a supposed sexually transmitted phantom into existence to scapegoat as The blame for clusters of deaths occurring in a distinct subculture that practiced immune suppressive lifestyle factors.
Instead of recognizing the multiple assaults to immune function as the problem, blame was cast on the “free love”.
All the power and political influence that the coming together of the people produced was thwarted by widespread promotion of this supposedly sexually transmitted phantom driving division, distrust and fear instead of togetherness and free love.
All the Power Of The People was lost by allowing the fear driven, government promoted LIES of a sexually transmitted deadly phantom to divide We The People. Everyone became a potential deadly threat instead of a potential lover.
This method of psychological manipulation of the people has become increasingly more intense, varied and widespread.
EVERYTHING the government tells We The People is intended to cause division. Because what the government fears most is a coming together of We The People.
STOP FEARING PHANTOMS!
COME TOGETHER! RIGHT NOW!
Resistance is futile.
Join the Illuminati today!
ABOUT US https://share.google/RUh1svFx3jiFkbcIa
interesting read!
I sorta view things through the lens of a Transhumanist framework whereby these manipulated, emotion-driven issues of climate, AI, mRNA, and identity distortion are all the main pillars...
https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/transhumanism-is-the-extermination?r=8ypo0
I listened to Pollyana Summer this morning and it threw me back in 2020. Yes, the groove has been cut. Now with AI at their beck and call it is just a matter of time when the algorithm says fire for effect.
I like your allusion to an artillery barrage. That is what is next.
Appreciate that, Mike. That’s exactly the vibe I was aiming for—2020 as prelude, now with AI pulling the trigger.
Lewis, it is getting strangerer and strangerer. That is why The Third Wave by Toffler appears to have much to offer.
When it jumped into my hands and I saw what it laid out, it confirmed in me why all the words, all the sharing will not stop it.
We are now in a post word world because the info supersaturation has had its effect. We have convinced ourselves that this left index finger drill that I am tapping out in the dark on this stupid LED screen is real, and important and worth my effort to connect better with someone who shares an interest?, a belief?, a cause?, ...
Well all this may be correct, but in ten minutes it's over and the next online battle ensues.
This is Bugs Rabbit crazy living.
There is only one answer and if enough of humanity did this maybe we would stand a fighting chance.
Your Part 1 article on the Psychosomatic COVID which I just finished is part of the answer.
I had two mysterious events that now after your explanation seem like panic attacks.
My uncle suffered from epilepsy. I witnessed one in my grandma's kitchen and it shocked and then taught this 12 year old.
I shared the pieces on the panic attacks. I didn't write it.
Thanks for this insightful commentary, which is manifestly true.
All people need to do toward freeing themselves of this tyranny founded on falsehood, is question and think. Be rational in other words.
That is one reason I often wonder about so-called health freedom advocates and lockdown-masking-vaccine critics who evidently cannot understand that viruses have no support in scientific evidence.
For instance, if I were to write on substack, as a full or part time pursuit, why would I restrict my commentary to repeated criticism of one policy issue for years on end? Why would I confine my writing to that One Issue, rehashing the same points over and over in varied ways, never attaining a breakthrough in new knowledge, and accompanied by many other writers repeating the same warmed over hash that half of Americans already get?
Why would I name my blog after That Single Issue, thereby limiting its appeal and reach? Hot Tea and Minimum Wage Laws. It is odd.
Exactly, Rider. The whole point of “health freedom” should be to pursue truth wherever it leads—not to fence off the discussion at the edge of virology just because it feels safer or more palatable. If the virus paradigm itself is false—and the evidence strongly points that way—then endlessly critiquing lockdowns, masks, or mandates without questioning the root premise is like rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
It’s telling how many anti-lockdown voices still cling to germ theory like a life raft, even while exposing every other lie. They’ll call out Fauci, Pfizer, even the PCR scam—yet stop short of asking, was there ever a virus to begin with? That question breaks the spell. That question makes it all make sense.
As for those blogs stuck on one narrow lane—they may wake a few normies, sure. But if we’re serious about dismantling the system, we’ve got to go deeper. It’s not about hot tea or minimum wage laws. It’s about the architecture of belief itself—and how it’s been weaponized.
Truth isn’t niche. It’s explosive.
Thanks. I don't know but suspect that some write as paid controlled opposition.