The National Blueprint for Biodefense. Report by Bipartisan Commission on Biodefence April May 2025 pg3
The following are extracts from Dr. Martin’s interview with The Homeless Left as provided by Pétur Yngvi Leósson on Twitter (now X). We have embedded a video of the interview at the end of this article.
Dr. David Martin Issues An Emergency Warning On 29 May 2025
Since 1998, I have been briefing both law enforcement and intelligence agencies on biological weapons and chemical weapons violations.
I brought one of our unclassified briefing documents. This one happens to be from 2005 … on 25 April 2003 … the united states army was awarded patent on a biological weapons munition that was, I’ll just go ahead and read it to you just so you get a sense of how well protected we are and remember, we have been told that the Gain-of-Function research was all about you know, bad guys might do a thing so we have to find countermeasures, I just want to read this straight out of the patent which by the way was filed several years before and here´s where it says: “Projectile claim for aerosol composition includes a group of agents including crowd control agents, biological agents and chemical agents.”
Does that sound like countermeasures, or does that sound like a ballistic device to actually distribute a biological or chemical agent, because that is exactly what they say they are doing.
And here we have a patent that actually came out in 1997. This patent happens to be a blast-resistant rocket-propelled grenade that actually distributes, oh, that´s right: aerosolised biological and chemical weapons agents. This is actually in a book that we did, called ‘Vector Weaponisation‘.
They have rocket-propelled ordinances for dispersal of biological and chemical weapons against civilian populations, I just read it to you right out of the patent.
I don’t care how factual I am. I can hold up a document, I can show you there’s an RPG the US army has that can shoot biological weapons over a football stadium, and the good news is they can do that. I just showed it to you.
Or as this case that we now know is currently being cited as a desktop exercise, which is: ‘The National Blueprint For Biodefence: Immediate Action Needed To Defend Against Biological Threats’.
And if you read the fine print of that particular document you find that they are saying that on 4 July 2025, that´s just a month and a half from now we are going to have a biological attack on the 4th of July and we are going to have an attack that is going to, and I am quoting now, I am reading from the document: “… kill 280,000 Americans and infects 400,000 immediately. The same thing, two 200,000 animals dead with 800,000 animals sickened on a single day.”
Now, I am going to ask you a question. If you know that Event 201 absolutely precisely laid out exactly the events that unfolded under covid and you see that the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefence is saying that there is going to be an attack, and that attack is going to leave 200,000 people dead on 4 July, let’s just sit for a second in what I just said if we examine that, and by the way, I did this with SARS and I was doing what I am doing now.
I am saying: It´s coming, they said it´s coming. And people go, ‘yeah, well, but they wouldn’t really say it´s coming. They would not really do it.’ All that I am saying is: They just laid it out!
Appreciate you sharing this—but we’ve got to be careful here. Martin always makes it sound like he’s exposing something huge, but his whole warning still rests on the assumption that viruses and bioweapons like SARS-CoV-2 are real and can be deployed like gas over a stadium. That’s never been proven—these are paper threats based on old germ theory dogma, not actual functioning weapons.
Patents don’t prove something works—they just show someone imagined it. And these “simulations” like the Biodefense Blueprint are more about psychological priming than literal announcements. The fear is the real weapon.
Martin never questions the virus model itself—and that’s a big red flag. Just like with COVID, it’s the illusion of a pathogen that does the damage, not a real microbe.
The phantom was/is an illusion/delusion theorized into existence to scapegoat for the “historic increase in deaths” “in coming years” due to the “aging baby boomer generation” as predicted in this 2017 census article.
A 2017 census report predicts “historic increase in deaths” “in coming years” due to the “aging baby boomer” generation that is the exact and only demographic where two years later a phantom, highly transmissible “virus” is specifically deadly leaving every other generation unharmed despite widespread “infection” only “confirmed” by unverifiable testing for non-specific biological markers considered synonymous with infection but never demonstrated to cause disease.
Exactly right, Brother🍓. What they called “SARS-CoV-2” was a pretext—a narrative sleight of hand to explain away the long-anticipated mortality curve from aging boomers, while introducing a new paradigm of biopolitical control. No virus needed—just repurposed death certificates, a fraudulent test, and a media machine ready to declare a “pandemic.” The census projection was the real forecast. The phantom pathogen was just the smoke they used to sell the fire.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
Nailed it, Brother🍓. The script was written decades ago and COVID just ran the updated sequel. Phantom virus, bogus testing, broadened definitions, iatrogenic death blamed on the “pathogen,” and a toxic “lifesaving” product to seal the deal. Rinse and repeat.
Your HIV/AIDS comparison is spot on—it laid the groundwork for the COVID model: endless treatment justified by invisible, undetectable “viral loads,” and dissent crushed under the weight of “public health.” It’s pharma theology—faith in particles no one’s ever truly seen, backed by tests that prove nothing, and treatments that ensure lifelong dependency.
How people still don’t see through it? That’s the power of fear + authority + repetition. But the cracks are showing. Keep exposing the pattern.
The “free love” hippie era of the 1960s-70s brought about a coming together of the people that opposed war and government corruption.
The hippies, youth and homosexual communities that were previously mocked and scorned were recognized as powerful, influential forces.
The powers that shouldn’t be theorized a supposed sexually transmitted phantom into existence to scapegoat as The blame for clusters of deaths occurring in a distinct subculture that practiced immune suppressive lifestyle factors.
Instead of recognizing the multiple assaults to immune function as the problem, blame was cast on the “free love”.
All the power and political influence that the coming together of the people produced was thwarted by widespread promotion of this supposedly sexually transmitted phantom driving division, distrust and fear instead of togetherness and free love.
All the Power Of The People was lost by allowing the fear driven, government promoted LIES of a sexually transmitted deadly phantom to divide We The People. Everyone became a potential deadly threat instead of a potential lover.
This method of psychological manipulation of the people has become increasingly more intense, varied and widespread.
EVERYTHING the government tells We The People is intended to cause division. Because what the government fears most is a coming together of We The People.
take a moment to recognize failure of every expectation, prediction, threat and promise made in the 1984 proposed but unproven hiv/AIDS theory that would or could prove it to be true.
We were told in 1984 there were an estimated one million hiv infected americans and without vaccine/cure that number would double annually “exploding” into general heterosexual population. “1 in 5 heterosexuals” were expected to be hiv positive by 1990. The population of Africa where the phantom was theorized to have originated and transferred to humans via eating, being bitten by or having sex with monkeys was predicted to be decimated by turn of the century-last century.
Today, despite increase of nearly every other sexually transmitted infection in the general population, hiv remains primarily restricted to original risk groups testing and being treated for the theoretical phantom that has never been found/isolated from a human body but only presumed present based on unverifiable tests for non-specific biological markers. 37years into this non-spreading sexually transmitted epidemic the number of infected americans has only risen from 1 to 1.2 million. Meanwhile, despite unending famine, drought, endemic disease relabeled “AIDS”, genocidal conflict and with no improvement in living conditions the population of Africa has more than doubled. Since the 1985 Bangui definition of AIDS in Africa no hiv test is required for AIDS diagnosis in Africa. How do they prove causation?
It is interesting that Keith Haring who died from the toxic treatments prescribed to fight a phantom hiv used cutting a snake- a certain religions image of a lying demon- as symbol for stopping AIDS. If you look at the facts, clearly hiv is a lie.
When, where, how and by who was the suspected disease causing agent that would eventually be called “hiv” obtained from a patient suffering distinct illness, reduced to a purified isolate required to establish a certified Gold Standard required for diagnostic testing and demonstrated to cause identical illness when infecting a new host? How else would infectious illness by a specific agent be demonstrated?
If you can’t show why you believe that what you do is true and you only believe it because it is all you have ever been unquestioningly taught while you reject but cannot refute or even demonstrate comprehension of detailed science, extensively researched fact and verifiable data that refutes what you believe but can not prove or even demonstrate comprehension of how is your belief anything other than your religion?
Been Rethinking AIDS since 1987. Been a member of the Group For The Scientific Reappraisal Of The HIV/AIDS Theory since it began. That is how i was fortunate enough to get to know/communicate with David. Sadly, my final months/years of communication with David up until a few weeks before he died are lost/frozen in my twitspacex account that i am on a lifetime ban from for voicing my dissent to the “covid” phantom/lie.
Wish could find a copy of his The Infectious Myth-a book project by David Crowe.
Dr.David Martin is great to follow where he explains how these SARS things were created...and how there are 'patents' on them...biological warfare has been going on for long time. When travelling armies passed through countries they were held in quarantine...for they had 'unknown' illness/diseases...all a ploy to keep people in a locked down helpless situation. Enslavement...yes, it is going on now in front of us.
It is proven that no virus, including "Sars-Cov-2" has ever been "isolated". We all know what "isolation" means: that's what they do to you when they believe you are "infected". Why "isolate" a "virus"? because one can't look through an electron microscope to see and identify "viruses". They see a vast field of disparate heterogenous particles, all different shapes and sizes. They see nothing of note to distinguish the character of particles displayed in a biological sample taken from a sick person from the sample taken from a well person.
So how can they prove some particles are "viral"? Gather identical particles (they're all supposed to be knock-offs) and test them. Do they go into tissues and cells? Prove it. Do they self replicate using "cellular machinery"? Prove it. What is "cellular machinery" and how does it work? Prove it. Do the isolated particles sicken people and animals when exposed in a natural way? Prove it. Do they jump from sick to well [people making them sick too? Prove it.
None of these fore-going has ever been proven. In fact, no one has ever conducted experiments using a pure specimen of particles regarded as "virus candidates" to test whether OR NOT the particles behave in accordance with "virus definition".
This is why the fact that no published studies exist proving virus isolation is important. No isolated virus means no proof of the existence of a virus. Of any virus whatsoever.
Think this is hot air and misinformation? Great! Show me a study proving physical isolation of some virus. That ought to be easy. No one ever does...because there are none.
Exactly, Rider—and this is why I keep hammering this point home. Because for many people, it hasn't even occurred to them to ask these questions. They've never stopped to think what "isolation" should actually mean, or why no one can point to a single study where a pure, physical virus was separated from all other material and shown to cause disease. Once you see it, you can't unsee it—but getting people to take that first look takes persistence.
I’d be cautious about Martin too, Beate. While he raises some valid points about patents and conflicts of interest, he still accepts the central premise—that SARS-like viruses are real, dangerous entities created in labs. That keeps everyone trapped in the same fear-based germ theory narrative.
The bigger issue isn’t whether the virus was “engineered”—it’s whether it was ever proven to exist as a pathogenic entity in the first place. No proper isolation, no purification, just computer-generated sequences and toxic cell cultures passed off as proof. In that sense, Martin may be (intentionally or not) steering people away from questioning the core fraud of virology itself.
Sometimes the most effective "opposition" is the kind that reinforces the foundational myth while appearing to challenge it.
Thanks, Elusive1. Totally with you—this whole saga exposed how “experts” often function more like enforcers of consensus than seekers of truth. The coordination wasn’t just about deception—it was about performance, with each institution playing its role in a grand theater of authority. After this, “trust the experts” sounds more like a punchline than advice.
Exactly. The pattern’s the same: credentialed gatekeepers wielding “consensus” like a cudgel to shut down dissent. Whether it’s virology or climate science, the playbook relies on the public mistaking authority for truth. Strip away the lab coats and policy briefs, and it starts to look a lot like priesthoods protecting doctrine—not scientists pursuing knowledge.
I hear you—it is exasperating. The damage isn’t just physical, it’s psychological and even spiritual. And the worst part is, once people buy in, the sunk-cost fallacy kicks in hard. They need the narrative to be true because admitting they were duped would collapse too much of their worldview. That’s why I focus less on trying to “convert” everyone and more on exposing the mechanics of the illusion—so the next round of fear propaganda hits a more skeptical public. And hey, waking up in 2019? That’s still ahead of the curve.
EMERGENCY BROADCAST ‼️
The National Blueprint for Biodefense. Report by Bipartisan Commission on Biodefence April May 2025 pg3
The following are extracts from Dr. Martin’s interview with The Homeless Left as provided by Pétur Yngvi Leósson on Twitter (now X). We have embedded a video of the interview at the end of this article.
Dr. David Martin Issues An Emergency Warning On 29 May 2025
Since 1998, I have been briefing both law enforcement and intelligence agencies on biological weapons and chemical weapons violations.
I brought one of our unclassified briefing documents. This one happens to be from 2005 … on 25 April 2003 … the united states army was awarded patent on a biological weapons munition that was, I’ll just go ahead and read it to you just so you get a sense of how well protected we are and remember, we have been told that the Gain-of-Function research was all about you know, bad guys might do a thing so we have to find countermeasures, I just want to read this straight out of the patent which by the way was filed several years before and here´s where it says: “Projectile claim for aerosol composition includes a group of agents including crowd control agents, biological agents and chemical agents.”
Does that sound like countermeasures, or does that sound like a ballistic device to actually distribute a biological or chemical agent, because that is exactly what they say they are doing.
And here we have a patent that actually came out in 1997. This patent happens to be a blast-resistant rocket-propelled grenade that actually distributes, oh, that´s right: aerosolised biological and chemical weapons agents. This is actually in a book that we did, called ‘Vector Weaponisation‘.
They have rocket-propelled ordinances for dispersal of biological and chemical weapons against civilian populations, I just read it to you right out of the patent.
I don’t care how factual I am. I can hold up a document, I can show you there’s an RPG the US army has that can shoot biological weapons over a football stadium, and the good news is they can do that. I just showed it to you.
Or as this case that we now know is currently being cited as a desktop exercise, which is: ‘The National Blueprint For Biodefence: Immediate Action Needed To Defend Against Biological Threats’.
And if you read the fine print of that particular document you find that they are saying that on 4 July 2025, that´s just a month and a half from now we are going to have a biological attack on the 4th of July and we are going to have an attack that is going to, and I am quoting now, I am reading from the document: “… kill 280,000 Americans and infects 400,000 immediately. The same thing, two 200,000 animals dead with 800,000 animals sickened on a single day.”
Now, I am going to ask you a question. If you know that Event 201 absolutely precisely laid out exactly the events that unfolded under covid and you see that the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefence is saying that there is going to be an attack, and that attack is going to leave 200,000 people dead on 4 July, let’s just sit for a second in what I just said if we examine that, and by the way, I did this with SARS and I was doing what I am doing now.
I am saying: It´s coming, they said it´s coming. And people go, ‘yeah, well, but they wouldn’t really say it´s coming. They would not really do it.’ All that I am saying is: They just laid it out!
-from lionessofjudah@substack.com
Appreciate you sharing this—but we’ve got to be careful here. Martin always makes it sound like he’s exposing something huge, but his whole warning still rests on the assumption that viruses and bioweapons like SARS-CoV-2 are real and can be deployed like gas over a stadium. That’s never been proven—these are paper threats based on old germ theory dogma, not actual functioning weapons.
Patents don’t prove something works—they just show someone imagined it. And these “simulations” like the Biodefense Blueprint are more about psychological priming than literal announcements. The fear is the real weapon.
Martin never questions the virus model itself—and that’s a big red flag. Just like with COVID, it’s the illusion of a pathogen that does the damage, not a real microbe.
You might appreciate this series. Covid revealed how far the fall has been.
Church deception series:
Part 1:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/s1-ep-1-of-3-fall-of-the-church-ecclesia?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
Part 2:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/s1-ep-2-of-3-the-church-has-fallen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
Part 3:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/s1-ep-3-of-3-the-church-has-fallen?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
There is no “sars-cov2” “virus”.
The phantom was/is an illusion/delusion theorized into existence to scapegoat for the “historic increase in deaths” “in coming years” due to the “aging baby boomer generation” as predicted in this 2017 census article.
A 2017 census report predicts “historic increase in deaths” “in coming years” due to the “aging baby boomer” generation that is the exact and only demographic where two years later a phantom, highly transmissible “virus” is specifically deadly leaving every other generation unharmed despite widespread “infection” only “confirmed” by unverifiable testing for non-specific biological markers considered synonymous with infection but never demonstrated to cause disease.
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2017/10/aging-boomers-deaths.html
Exactly right, Brother🍓. What they called “SARS-CoV-2” was a pretext—a narrative sleight of hand to explain away the long-anticipated mortality curve from aging boomers, while introducing a new paradigm of biopolitical control. No virus needed—just repurposed death certificates, a fraudulent test, and a media machine ready to declare a “pandemic.” The census projection was the real forecast. The phantom pathogen was just the smoke they used to sell the fire.
Step1-Identify cluster of deaths.
Step2-Blame a phantom based on mass, flawed, unverifiable testing of a population for RNA fragments presumed synonymous with infection by the phantom.
Silence dissent.
Step3-Expand disease definition to include illness previously recognized caused by other or unknown causes but occur in the presence of the phantom thus increasing “case count”.
Silence dissent
Step4-Prescribe toxic treatment like AZT/intubation to increase death count and blame those deaths on the phantom not the treatment.
Silence dissent
Step5-Insist lifetime less toxic, slower killing “cocktail therapy”/“vaccine boosters” are only protection/defense against often undetectable phantom.
Silence dissent
SARS-cov2/covid19 is hiv/AIDS2.0.
Both are a LIE.
If hepatitis-c is “cured” when no virus is detected why does an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load and t-cell count 600+ require lifetime treatment with a balanced “cocktail” of slow killing, toxic chemotherapeutic drugs that have known side effects that mirror the definition of AIDS?
If an AIDS patient with undetectable viral load went for an AIDS test and didn’t tell that they were previously hiv positive they would be told they were not infected and do not need treatment but would be encouraged to begin the recently released hiv vaccine that requires injection every two months. For the rest of your sexually active life.
As with any profit based business, ensuring return customers is vital for success.
If as is claimed, hiv remains latent, inactive, not reproducing and undetectable in hidden reservoirs how can anyone ever be certain they are not infected and the virus isn’t just inactive and undetectable in hidden reservoirs?
Why isn’t everyone on anti-hiv treatment? Just in case.
To protect others.
For the common good.
How are people not seeing through this bs?
Nailed it, Brother🍓. The script was written decades ago and COVID just ran the updated sequel. Phantom virus, bogus testing, broadened definitions, iatrogenic death blamed on the “pathogen,” and a toxic “lifesaving” product to seal the deal. Rinse and repeat.
Your HIV/AIDS comparison is spot on—it laid the groundwork for the COVID model: endless treatment justified by invisible, undetectable “viral loads,” and dissent crushed under the weight of “public health.” It’s pharma theology—faith in particles no one’s ever truly seen, backed by tests that prove nothing, and treatments that ensure lifelong dependency.
How people still don’t see through it? That’s the power of fear + authority + repetition. But the cracks are showing. Keep exposing the pattern.
The “free love” hippie era of the 1960s-70s brought about a coming together of the people that opposed war and government corruption.
The hippies, youth and homosexual communities that were previously mocked and scorned were recognized as powerful, influential forces.
The powers that shouldn’t be theorized a supposed sexually transmitted phantom into existence to scapegoat as The blame for clusters of deaths occurring in a distinct subculture that practiced immune suppressive lifestyle factors.
Instead of recognizing the multiple assaults to immune function as the problem, blame was cast on the “free love”.
All the power and political influence that the coming together of the people produced was thwarted by widespread promotion of this supposedly sexually transmitted phantom driving division, distrust and fear instead of togetherness and free love.
All the Power Of The People was lost by allowing the fear driven, government promoted LIES of a sexually transmitted deadly phantom to divide We The People. Everyone became a potential deadly threat instead of a potential lover.
This method of psychological manipulation of the people has become increasingly more intense, varied and widespread.
EVERYTHING the government tells We The People is intended to cause division. Because what the government fears most is a coming together of We The People.
STOP FEARING PHANTOMS!
COME TOGETHER! RIGHT NOW!
take a moment to recognize failure of every expectation, prediction, threat and promise made in the 1984 proposed but unproven hiv/AIDS theory that would or could prove it to be true.
We were told in 1984 there were an estimated one million hiv infected americans and without vaccine/cure that number would double annually “exploding” into general heterosexual population. “1 in 5 heterosexuals” were expected to be hiv positive by 1990. The population of Africa where the phantom was theorized to have originated and transferred to humans via eating, being bitten by or having sex with monkeys was predicted to be decimated by turn of the century-last century.
Today, despite increase of nearly every other sexually transmitted infection in the general population, hiv remains primarily restricted to original risk groups testing and being treated for the theoretical phantom that has never been found/isolated from a human body but only presumed present based on unverifiable tests for non-specific biological markers. 37years into this non-spreading sexually transmitted epidemic the number of infected americans has only risen from 1 to 1.2 million. Meanwhile, despite unending famine, drought, endemic disease relabeled “AIDS”, genocidal conflict and with no improvement in living conditions the population of Africa has more than doubled. Since the 1985 Bangui definition of AIDS in Africa no hiv test is required for AIDS diagnosis in Africa. How do they prove causation?
It is interesting that Keith Haring who died from the toxic treatments prescribed to fight a phantom hiv used cutting a snake- a certain religions image of a lying demon- as symbol for stopping AIDS. If you look at the facts, clearly hiv is a lie.
Why do You believe it?
Visit Rethinkingaids.com
Don’t get your information from wikipedia. Look at the facts.
Read the extensive work of Dr Peter Duesberg on the subject. http://duesberg.com/papers/index.html
When, where, how and by who was the suspected disease causing agent that would eventually be called “hiv” obtained from a patient suffering distinct illness, reduced to a purified isolate required to establish a certified Gold Standard required for diagnostic testing and demonstrated to cause identical illness when infecting a new host? How else would infectious illness by a specific agent be demonstrated?
If you can’t show why you believe that what you do is true and you only believe it because it is all you have ever been unquestioningly taught while you reject but cannot refute or even demonstrate comprehension of detailed science, extensively researched fact and verifiable data that refutes what you believe but can not prove or even demonstrate comprehension of how is your belief anything other than your religion?
Flaws In The Coronavirus Pandemic Theory published March/June 2020 by David Crowe.
Unfortunately Davod is no longer with us. I had some communication with him about the great polio hoax pre-plandemic.
Been Rethinking AIDS since 1987. Been a member of the Group For The Scientific Reappraisal Of The HIV/AIDS Theory since it began. That is how i was fortunate enough to get to know/communicate with David. Sadly, my final months/years of communication with David up until a few weeks before he died are lost/frozen in my twitspacex account that i am on a lifetime ban from for voicing my dissent to the “covid” phantom/lie.
Wish could find a copy of his The Infectious Myth-a book project by David Crowe.
It is a cult; A Jewish Zio-Genocide cult.
Dr.David Martin is great to follow where he explains how these SARS things were created...and how there are 'patents' on them...biological warfare has been going on for long time. When travelling armies passed through countries they were held in quarantine...for they had 'unknown' illness/diseases...all a ploy to keep people in a locked down helpless situation. Enslavement...yes, it is going on now in front of us.
It is proven that no virus, including "Sars-Cov-2" has ever been "isolated". We all know what "isolation" means: that's what they do to you when they believe you are "infected". Why "isolate" a "virus"? because one can't look through an electron microscope to see and identify "viruses". They see a vast field of disparate heterogenous particles, all different shapes and sizes. They see nothing of note to distinguish the character of particles displayed in a biological sample taken from a sick person from the sample taken from a well person.
So how can they prove some particles are "viral"? Gather identical particles (they're all supposed to be knock-offs) and test them. Do they go into tissues and cells? Prove it. Do they self replicate using "cellular machinery"? Prove it. What is "cellular machinery" and how does it work? Prove it. Do the isolated particles sicken people and animals when exposed in a natural way? Prove it. Do they jump from sick to well [people making them sick too? Prove it.
None of these fore-going has ever been proven. In fact, no one has ever conducted experiments using a pure specimen of particles regarded as "virus candidates" to test whether OR NOT the particles behave in accordance with "virus definition".
This is why the fact that no published studies exist proving virus isolation is important. No isolated virus means no proof of the existence of a virus. Of any virus whatsoever.
Think this is hot air and misinformation? Great! Show me a study proving physical isolation of some virus. That ought to be easy. No one ever does...because there are none.
Exactly, Rider—and this is why I keep hammering this point home. Because for many people, it hasn't even occurred to them to ask these questions. They've never stopped to think what "isolation" should actually mean, or why no one can point to a single study where a pure, physical virus was separated from all other material and shown to cause disease. Once you see it, you can't unsee it—but getting people to take that first look takes persistence.
I’d be cautious about Martin too, Beate. While he raises some valid points about patents and conflicts of interest, he still accepts the central premise—that SARS-like viruses are real, dangerous entities created in labs. That keeps everyone trapped in the same fear-based germ theory narrative.
The bigger issue isn’t whether the virus was “engineered”—it’s whether it was ever proven to exist as a pathogenic entity in the first place. No proper isolation, no purification, just computer-generated sequences and toxic cell cultures passed off as proof. In that sense, Martin may be (intentionally or not) steering people away from questioning the core fraud of virology itself.
Sometimes the most effective "opposition" is the kind that reinforces the foundational myth while appearing to challenge it.
Thanks, Elusive1. Totally with you—this whole saga exposed how “experts” often function more like enforcers of consensus than seekers of truth. The coordination wasn’t just about deception—it was about performance, with each institution playing its role in a grand theater of authority. After this, “trust the experts” sounds more like a punchline than advice.
Exactly. The pattern’s the same: credentialed gatekeepers wielding “consensus” like a cudgel to shut down dissent. Whether it’s virology or climate science, the playbook relies on the public mistaking authority for truth. Strip away the lab coats and policy briefs, and it starts to look a lot like priesthoods protecting doctrine—not scientists pursuing knowledge.
I hear you—it is exasperating. The damage isn’t just physical, it’s psychological and even spiritual. And the worst part is, once people buy in, the sunk-cost fallacy kicks in hard. They need the narrative to be true because admitting they were duped would collapse too much of their worldview. That’s why I focus less on trying to “convert” everyone and more on exposing the mechanics of the illusion—so the next round of fear propaganda hits a more skeptical public. And hey, waking up in 2019? That’s still ahead of the curve.