I see many different possibilities, but to be clear, the 1) and 2) re: my leading candidates for a"alt" COVID meanings aren't sequential - they're simultaneous. I think it may refer to an operation AND to a previously-observed, non-spreading disease associated with vaccination
That simultaneity makes a lot of sense: COVID as both the name for the operation and a convenient cover for a pre-existing, vaccine-related condition. It’s a flexible label that serves both strategic and diagnostic functions—depending on who’s using it and why.
Appreciate you continuing to refine and expand this line of inquiry. It’s one of the few frameworks that actually fits the chaos we lived through.
Thanks and you're welcome. Yes, I think it fits the chaos and tracks with the semantic games and authorities' "need" for plausible deniability.
Many people assert the events were planned and a military/intel effort but haven't necessarily thought that all the way through on the 'origins' side.
We also have people who are (rightly) saying GoF did not result in a super-spreading pathogen but insist on one or more poisoning events (excluding the COVID shots). Practically speaking, I don't see how that line of thought DOESN'T empower the perpetrators in much the same ways.
Exactly. Once you see the origins as deliberately vague and semiotic—crafted more for narrative control than biological precision—it starts to look less like a scientific event and more like the founding of a belief system.
The ambiguity wasn’t a bug—it was a feature. It allowed different factions to project their own fears, explanations, and rituals onto COVID. That’s why I keep circling back to the idea that this became a religion—with its own dogma (PCR = truth), its heretics, and even sacraments (the shot, the mask).
And you’re right: when people insist on some single toxic event—just not the COVID shots—they’re still reinforcing the idea that there was a mysterious, external “thing” that justified the global reaction. That keeps the myth alive.
Great point, Dee Dee—and I completely agree this deserves a closer look.
When I described the PCR protocol as “flawed,” I was referring to its technical origins—like the Corman-Drosten paper and the fact that the test was based on a computer-assembled sequence, not a purified virus. But you're absolutely right: once that flawed tool hit the real world, it wasn’t just sloppily applied—it was weaponized.
Hospitals diagnosing COVID with positive PCR and no symptoms, or even with negative tests but vague “COVID-like” presentations? That doesn’t suggest accidental overreach—it suggests deliberate inflation. So yes, the flaw might have been the entry point, but what followed was more like systemic fraud.
Thanks for calling that out—it’s not just a distinction in wording, but in intention.
I know I have beat this with a hammer, BUT they force separated moms and babies for 10 days based on a one time positive PCR (mom) with ZERO symptoms IF baby was in the NICU. This had never been done before and judging from what I observed, the harm was immeasurable. I never could find the “policy” but heard it derived from the CDC. The neonatologists where I work, embraced it fully. I met a traveling NICU RN and she said they were doing it on the east coast as well. She also added, she had never seen a NICU baby with Covid. Reminds me of AIDS and how nurses were told, the baby “retro converts”. Thank-you again for remaining open to a disease not sweeping through our nation before the jabs and offering an explanation as to why my hospital was virtually empty during 2020.
23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (PHARMAKEIA) were all nations deceived.
I love the title and the article! I think it should be mandatory reading for everyone, at the very least the title! Just like any war, so many people are duped and coerced into crimes against humanity.
Thanks, Thomas! That means a lot. Totally agree—like with any war, the first casualty was truth. And in this one, the weapon wasn’t a virus—it was belief, manufactured and reinforced until questioning it felt like heresy. Glad the title struck a chord. If more people just paused and asked what exactly happened in early 2020, the whole narrative might start to unravel.
Let's hope, we the people, don't get fooled again! The profiteer's psyops come with years of indoctrination and sophistication. However, just realizing there's an ulterior motive and that's the bottom line, perhaps more awareness will transpire because of articles like yours written by people that care, like you. Thank you!
Very good analysis. Does turfseer mean "astroturf seer"?
No, Turf as in Thoroughbred Grass Racing. A Horse race handicapper!
TY! In 30 minutes, Dr. Andy Kaufman refutes and disproves virology. Includes Pandemic Virus Recipe. Good resource. https://odysee.com/@HereAndNow:a/Dr.-Andrew-Kaufman-at-Anarchapulco-2022---Surviving-The-Age-Of-The-Virus:9?t=163
Thanks for highlighting the article!
I see many different possibilities, but to be clear, the 1) and 2) re: my leading candidates for a"alt" COVID meanings aren't sequential - they're simultaneous. I think it may refer to an operation AND to a previously-observed, non-spreading disease associated with vaccination
Thanks, Jessica—really helpful clarification.
That simultaneity makes a lot of sense: COVID as both the name for the operation and a convenient cover for a pre-existing, vaccine-related condition. It’s a flexible label that serves both strategic and diagnostic functions—depending on who’s using it and why.
Appreciate you continuing to refine and expand this line of inquiry. It’s one of the few frameworks that actually fits the chaos we lived through.
Thanks and you're welcome. Yes, I think it fits the chaos and tracks with the semantic games and authorities' "need" for plausible deniability.
Many people assert the events were planned and a military/intel effort but haven't necessarily thought that all the way through on the 'origins' side.
We also have people who are (rightly) saying GoF did not result in a super-spreading pathogen but insist on one or more poisoning events (excluding the COVID shots). Practically speaking, I don't see how that line of thought DOESN'T empower the perpetrators in much the same ways.
Exactly. Once you see the origins as deliberately vague and semiotic—crafted more for narrative control than biological precision—it starts to look less like a scientific event and more like the founding of a belief system.
The ambiguity wasn’t a bug—it was a feature. It allowed different factions to project their own fears, explanations, and rituals onto COVID. That’s why I keep circling back to the idea that this became a religion—with its own dogma (PCR = truth), its heretics, and even sacraments (the shot, the mask).
And you’re right: when people insist on some single toxic event—just not the COVID shots—they’re still reinforcing the idea that there was a mysterious, external “thing” that justified the global reaction. That keeps the myth alive.
Yes - and keeps us afraid of the government and Mad Scientists
I stand in agreement but would like to dissect this point:
"SARS-CoV-2 is not a proven, transmissible pathogen, but rather a computer-assembled genetic sequence attached to a flawed PCR testing protocol".
The hospitals labeled everything as Covid including,
negative PCR, positive symptoms,
positive PCR, positive symptoms, and
positive PCR, negative symptoms
which to me suggests a more calculated nefarious nature instead of simply, "a flaw".
Great point, Dee Dee—and I completely agree this deserves a closer look.
When I described the PCR protocol as “flawed,” I was referring to its technical origins—like the Corman-Drosten paper and the fact that the test was based on a computer-assembled sequence, not a purified virus. But you're absolutely right: once that flawed tool hit the real world, it wasn’t just sloppily applied—it was weaponized.
Hospitals diagnosing COVID with positive PCR and no symptoms, or even with negative tests but vague “COVID-like” presentations? That doesn’t suggest accidental overreach—it suggests deliberate inflation. So yes, the flaw might have been the entry point, but what followed was more like systemic fraud.
Thanks for calling that out—it’s not just a distinction in wording, but in intention.
I know I have beat this with a hammer, BUT they force separated moms and babies for 10 days based on a one time positive PCR (mom) with ZERO symptoms IF baby was in the NICU. This had never been done before and judging from what I observed, the harm was immeasurable. I never could find the “policy” but heard it derived from the CDC. The neonatologists where I work, embraced it fully. I met a traveling NICU RN and she said they were doing it on the east coast as well. She also added, she had never seen a NICU baby with Covid. Reminds me of AIDS and how nurses were told, the baby “retro converts”. Thank-you again for remaining open to a disease not sweeping through our nation before the jabs and offering an explanation as to why my hospital was virtually empty during 2020.
Governments have used drugs to control populations for a long time, learn about it in my podcast here: https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/true-drug-history-a-means-of-control?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
Revelation 18:23
King James Version
23 And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries (PHARMAKEIA) were all nations deceived.
I love the title and the article! I think it should be mandatory reading for everyone, at the very least the title! Just like any war, so many people are duped and coerced into crimes against humanity.
Thanks, Thomas! That means a lot. Totally agree—like with any war, the first casualty was truth. And in this one, the weapon wasn’t a virus—it was belief, manufactured and reinforced until questioning it felt like heresy. Glad the title struck a chord. If more people just paused and asked what exactly happened in early 2020, the whole narrative might start to unravel.
Let's hope, we the people, don't get fooled again! The profiteer's psyops come with years of indoctrination and sophistication. However, just realizing there's an ulterior motive and that's the bottom line, perhaps more awareness will transpire because of articles like yours written by people that care, like you. Thank you!
I've said it before and I'll say it again, For the Love of Money, lies hide the truth till the bitter end.
So Perfect a Picture!!