Appreciate you sharing that, Elusive1. It’s always revealing how these articles slip in huge assumptions without batting an eye—like “reactivation of dormant virus” and “viruses target the nervous system”—as if those are settled facts, not hypotheses built on cell culture guesswork.
Interesting how the conclusion is always the same, too: more vaccines. No discussion of toxicity, terrain, or what else might explain both shingles and cognitive decline. Just plug the jab and move on.
But yes—I do appreciate reading it. These little blurbs say a lot about the narrative machinery in action.
I'm curious, do you have a science background? You don't have to answer. I'm just wondering how you know so much to be able to write and reply so "authoritatively" on this ( and so much else)? 😁
So munch of the propaganda of fear porn over Covid 19 virus! I applied for an RN job the other day I got told I passed the interview but they send me an email to provide evidence of 1x Covid vaccination. And because I never had the Covid shot shit, I was told I can’t proceed ! With my 15 years of experience and being good at my job , I got turn down because of failure to provide 1x Covid vaccination evidence!
That’s heartbreaking—and infuriating. Fifteen years of experience should speak louder than one pointless checkbox on a form. You’ve dedicated yourself to helping others, and now you're being sidelined over a shot you had every right to refuse.
This is the human cost of medical coercion—talented, compassionate professionals pushed out for not complying with a political ritual masquerading as science. You’re not alone, and your stand matters more than ever.
Thank you for your kind words!’ When my heart and soul feels like breaking, words like yours remind me to stand my ground and remember who I am and what I’m fighting for!
It is great to have a simple comparison as you have done. I have said since 2020 that viruses are meant to be in the original meaning 'poison, slime, venom', such as the pus from boils and wounds.
It is much nitrogenous waste, hence pale green, and this excess waste is toxic and must be expelled. But it is the result of disease rather than the cause, although of course if it remains in the body it will cause harm.
I may have said before but the word 'virus' sounds like 'via us' and such stuff does come via us, from us.
Yes. Placebo is a proven healer. I chalk that up to frequency attenuation. Prayer is a proven which I attribute to higher dimensional relational coherence. Iatropic disasters are resulting physical mistakes by staff and procedures. Imagine in a coma hearing a “doctor” declare you brain dead and if an organ donor, proceed to immediately begin “harvesting” organs. This is not a fantasy. Today medicine is as backwards as blood letting and leeches.
So much fakery. I had a conversation with an actual University virologist and caused her to glitch out because I ripped apart her fantasy about viruses.
She would not allow herself to believe it was a lie because of the trade-off; she tells herself that the benefits outweigh the damage caused by vaccination. If there is no benefit because viruses are fake, then all she is causing is harm, sickness and death.
This locks her in the lie to self-preserve her career and maintain immunity from culpability.
This is a giant psychological operation with delayed consequences that allow people to believe the lie and profit from it.
I explain the delayed consequence in my podcast episode here:
I’d be curious what exactly she said when you pressed her on the lack of evidence for viruses. How did you frame the question? Did you go straight to the issue of purification and isolation, or start with the cell culture fraud?
Her reaction—“glitching out”—suggests deep cognitive dissonance. As you said, if viruses don’t exist, then her entire profession becomes a kind of ritual theater, justified only by belief. That’s a heavy psychological burden to confront mid-conversation.
Would love to hear how you phrased it and what part made her recoil the most.
I asked her to define viral isolation. She said it was over my head; then I started explaining to her in technical terms the process. Lol. She started wiggling around and refused to talk in plain English about the process. Then she became really mad..... claiming I was misunderstanding and what I was saying could not be true..... like an ideologically possessed person who must cling to a lie for self-preservation.....
Classic. The moment you out-tech the technocrat, the mask slips. “It’s over your head” is the first line of defense—then when you prove it isn’t, they either short-circuit or lash out. Because if they admit you understand the process and still question it, the whole spell breaks.
You didn’t misunderstand her. You understood her too well. That’s what really made her squirm.
Exactly. She became really uncomfortable when she could not B.S. me into supporting her lies. It shocked her, really. As if it never happened before. Hmmm.
Thanks for putting this in lay language. The viral paradigm [germ theory] is challenged by these anomalies - see Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions - as the behaviour of the moons of Jupiter was an anomaly recognised by Galileo (and before him Copernicus) that challenged the predictive consistency of the Ptolemaic Paradigm (geocentrism). The Covid event marks the cusp of a shift from the viral paradigm to whatever is the emerging explanation for diseases and their spread. We await another key paper on what may be a new way of understanding disease- but where amid the disciples of the 'normal science' do you find peers to review and pass it for publication? How do you get the new paradigm past the 'inquisition'?
Exactly, Simon. Paradigm shifts never happen because the establishment concedes—they happen when the anomalies pile up and can no longer be ignored. Virology is in its “epicycle” phase now, tacking on explanations that grow more convoluted the deeper you look.
The beauty of invoking Kuhn here is that he reminds us: it’s not facts that change minds—it’s frameworks collapsing under their own contradictions. And COVID may well be the telescope moment.
Appreciate your comment—it’s refreshing to see this level of philosophical depth in the discussion.
Yes yes yes! As you well know, the telescope that Galileo made was a means of seeing empirical evidence for his theorising. I find it fascinating that though the 'paradigm shift' from a geo- to helio- centric view is painted as highly, and only, oppositional, in fact the most exciting work from which that famous 17th century shift emerged, entailed lively, respectful and friendly disputation between scholars who enjoyed each other's company. At a distance from the conversation of people who loved science there was, of course, intense polarisation. Church, state and popular opinion were shaken to the core by rumours of a new and 'crazy' idea. That public conflict, notoriously, reached Galileo via the Church, even though senior theologists had been intimately involved in discussion of the new ideas - in private! I like to think that whether it's germ theory versus - say - terrain theory or virology versus some as yet unseen set of propositions, the truth will emerge among people who are not at each other's throats, but sincerely excited by the advancing of human knowledge about the nature of disease. https://thonyc.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/refusing-to-look/
Beautifully said, Simon. You’re absolutely right—the real paradigm shifts often begin not with public combat but with quiet, curious minds debating in good faith. The image of Galileo battling dogma is powerful, but as you note, it was also shaped by friendly inquiry behind the scenes—until power structures felt threatened.
That’s what I hope for too: that those questioning the viral model or proposing terrain-based alternatives don’t get cast as heretics but welcomed into a conversation about how we really come to know. Because if truth emerges anywhere, it’s likely in those honest, energized spaces between conflicting ideas—not in the shouting match, but in the “what if?” rooms.
Thanks for the link—looking forward to digging in.
Enjoyed this post and the comments! My Energy Med post support Parasites as producing poison the central nervous system and cause hormonal deficiencies or imbalances and both environmental/manmade Poisons/Toxins result in cancer, HiV, Polio etc. Natural Medicine / Naturopathic Doctors / Trad. Chin. Med. Boil down all diseases as eventually a frequency based disruption.
Appreciate you weighing in, Dr. Hall. I’m not sure if you’re right, wrong, or somewhere in between—but it’s interesting how different frameworks (parasites, toxins, frequency disruptions) all try to explain what the virus model papered over with vague imagery and genetic code.
If we drop the viral paradigm, then yeah—we’re left with a lot of “what is making people sick?” questions. Could be terrain, toxicity, energetics, or some blend. But the key thing is: at least now we’re asking instead of chanting “pathogen did it” on cue.
Would be curious to hear what kind of clinical outcomes you’ve seen in practice with this frequency-based approach.
Not large study for my work only small “country free Clinic” practice. The TCM and Rife freq world, along with homeopathy, have years of background however, Not Expecting nor predicting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster‐RCTs, screening at entry ports, isolation, quarantine, physical distancing, personal protection, hand hygiene, face masks, glasses, and gargling as to prevent respiratory virus transmission.
Placebo IS an intervention … maybe interspersed with “water and placebo” success in an Indian prison by incarcerated doctor. Fereydoon Batmanghelidj, M.D., an internationally renowned researcher, author and advocate of the natural healing power of water, was born in Iran in 1931.
Long ago (60’s) I lauded the results vs the predicted outcomes, etc. and relied upon thousands of years of TCM. We now see the Rockefeller petro based “medicines” along with iatropic disasters vs the condemned medical “home brew - hoax” regime
Thanks, Dr. Hall. I get where you’re coming from—many of the most interesting approaches don’t fit into the RCT model, and maybe never will. That said, it does raise a tough question: how do we separate genuine healing from placebo or practitioner influence when we move outside traditional trial structures?
Not saying it disqualifies your methods—just wondering how we build credibility for non-conventional systems without adopting the same flawed machinery that props up the viral paradigm.
Would be curious how you approach that balance in your clinic.
I HAVE CALLED VIRUSES " AN IDEA" , WHICH ALLOWS BIG PHARMA TO INDUCE FEAR, PUSH DRUGS AND VACCINES ON POPULATION AND MAKE A HUGE PROFIT. A GREAT BUSINESS MODEL!
Control is the point. They have the protection magic, and you do not. To get the magic from them, you must do what they say when they say it.
If the herd magic did not work, then someone did not get the magic, or the magic would have worked. Herd magic protection is only achieved if everyone does it. The fact that it did not work means someone did not do it, or everyone would have been protected. But the magic only works if everyone in theory doe does it, or it might fail, not the magics fault; the lack of participation is the problem.
Yes—classic conditional sorcery. The spell only works if everyone believes in it, and if it fails, that just proves someone broke the chant. It’s theological thinking dressed up in lab coats.
They’ve replaced falsifiability with faith, and public health has become a priesthood.
Of course I’ve seen the trick. The question is—how many more need to fall for it before the whole congregation walks out?
Say you look over your horse in search of maggots: You won't find any. Now shoot your horse, leave its carcass where it fell and return in a week. You'll find maggots and other insects, feeding on and dispatching the rotting carcass. The maggots show up when tissues decompose, not when tissues are alive and well.
I am pretty sure it is the same with bacteria and fungi. When tissues break down from injury or illness, they show up immediately, rain or shine--even on federal holidays. Their natural function is to break down and get rid of decomposition toxins and to recycle re-usable substances in service to life.
No bacterium has ever been shown to cause disease, because none could be demonstrated to fulfill Koch's Postulates--not even the first postulate. They could find some particular bacterium associating with sick people exhibiting symptoms of some "disease", but not every time. There are always numerous "cases" in which some bacterium suspected of causation was not present. Also the suspect would show up in well people, and so forth.
If bacteria caused illness, this would be easy to prove. No one has ever done so. Do I know this? No, I haven't done a deep dive, just a shallow one. But others have and this is what they've reported.
Anorexic bacteria produce toxic waste products that make people sick. People who ger root canal procedures in dentistry very often eventually fall iIl to heart disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer and other. The miles and miles of tubles in dead teeth host billions and billions of anorexic bacteria.
Thanks, Rider! That’s a terrific analogy—nature’s cleanup crew doesn’t show up for a job that doesn’t exist. And yes, you're spot-on about Koch’s Postulates. If bacteria were truly the cause of disease, rather than opportunists feasting on already-compromised tissue, we’d have clear, reproducible proof by now. But we don’t.
Also appreciate you bringing up the root canal angle—Weston Price was onto that a century ago, but mainstream dentistry still treats it like fringe theory. The deeper folks dig, the more germ theory looks like a rotting paradigm in desperate need of composting.
Had to share (re: "viruses")
In a "health" insert in my local paper this week, there's a small blurb titled:
SHINGLES VAXX LINKED TO REDUCED DEMENTIA RISK
Paraphrasing here:
1) Vax reduces reactivation of dormant varicella-zoster virus (linked to cognitive impairment),
2) also, that there's evidence that viruses target the nervous system which is linked to development of dementia
** (Research by Stanford U of 280,000 older adults in Wales)
Thought you'd appreciate reading!
Appreciate you sharing that, Elusive1. It’s always revealing how these articles slip in huge assumptions without batting an eye—like “reactivation of dormant virus” and “viruses target the nervous system”—as if those are settled facts, not hypotheses built on cell culture guesswork.
Interesting how the conclusion is always the same, too: more vaccines. No discussion of toxicity, terrain, or what else might explain both shingles and cognitive decline. Just plug the jab and move on.
But yes—I do appreciate reading it. These little blurbs say a lot about the narrative machinery in action.
Glad you read this!
I'm curious, do you have a science background? You don't have to answer. I'm just wondering how you know so much to be able to write and reply so "authoritatively" on this ( and so much else)? 😁
Let’s just say I’ve got an uncanny knack for asking the right questions—and a very patient research assistant who never sleeps. 😄
No formal science pedigree here, just a nose for shaky narratives and a habit of reading past the headlines.
So munch of the propaganda of fear porn over Covid 19 virus! I applied for an RN job the other day I got told I passed the interview but they send me an email to provide evidence of 1x Covid vaccination. And because I never had the Covid shot shit, I was told I can’t proceed ! With my 15 years of experience and being good at my job , I got turn down because of failure to provide 1x Covid vaccination evidence!
That’s heartbreaking—and infuriating. Fifteen years of experience should speak louder than one pointless checkbox on a form. You’ve dedicated yourself to helping others, and now you're being sidelined over a shot you had every right to refuse.
This is the human cost of medical coercion—talented, compassionate professionals pushed out for not complying with a political ritual masquerading as science. You’re not alone, and your stand matters more than ever.
Thank you for your kind words!’ When my heart and soul feels like breaking, words like yours remind me to stand my ground and remember who I am and what I’m fighting for!
Hero to many prisoners! From toothache to pancreas.
It is great to have a simple comparison as you have done. I have said since 2020 that viruses are meant to be in the original meaning 'poison, slime, venom', such as the pus from boils and wounds.
It is much nitrogenous waste, hence pale green, and this excess waste is toxic and must be expelled. But it is the result of disease rather than the cause, although of course if it remains in the body it will cause harm.
I may have said before but the word 'virus' sounds like 'via us' and such stuff does come via us, from us.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/coronavirus-is-it-really-a-monster?utm_source=publication-search
Yes. Placebo is a proven healer. I chalk that up to frequency attenuation. Prayer is a proven which I attribute to higher dimensional relational coherence. Iatropic disasters are resulting physical mistakes by staff and procedures. Imagine in a coma hearing a “doctor” declare you brain dead and if an organ donor, proceed to immediately begin “harvesting” organs. This is not a fantasy. Today medicine is as backwards as blood letting and leeches.
Live not by lies.
So much fakery. I had a conversation with an actual University virologist and caused her to glitch out because I ripped apart her fantasy about viruses.
She would not allow herself to believe it was a lie because of the trade-off; she tells herself that the benefits outweigh the damage caused by vaccination. If there is no benefit because viruses are fake, then all she is causing is harm, sickness and death.
This locks her in the lie to self-preserve her career and maintain immunity from culpability.
This is a giant psychological operation with delayed consequences that allow people to believe the lie and profit from it.
I explain the delayed consequence in my podcast episode here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/the-delayed-consequence-deception?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
I’d be curious what exactly she said when you pressed her on the lack of evidence for viruses. How did you frame the question? Did you go straight to the issue of purification and isolation, or start with the cell culture fraud?
Her reaction—“glitching out”—suggests deep cognitive dissonance. As you said, if viruses don’t exist, then her entire profession becomes a kind of ritual theater, justified only by belief. That’s a heavy psychological burden to confront mid-conversation.
Would love to hear how you phrased it and what part made her recoil the most.
I asked her to define viral isolation. She said it was over my head; then I started explaining to her in technical terms the process. Lol. She started wiggling around and refused to talk in plain English about the process. Then she became really mad..... claiming I was misunderstanding and what I was saying could not be true..... like an ideologically possessed person who must cling to a lie for self-preservation.....
Classic. The moment you out-tech the technocrat, the mask slips. “It’s over your head” is the first line of defense—then when you prove it isn’t, they either short-circuit or lash out. Because if they admit you understand the process and still question it, the whole spell breaks.
You didn’t misunderstand her. You understood her too well. That’s what really made her squirm.
Exactly. She became really uncomfortable when she could not B.S. me into supporting her lies. It shocked her, really. As if it never happened before. Hmmm.
We need to approach more of these "scientists" and chronicle their responses.
Candid Camera/Punked-style telescopic lens with a hidden microphone. Lol. Logic loops and nonsense spin. I AM SURE.
Thanks for putting this in lay language. The viral paradigm [germ theory] is challenged by these anomalies - see Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions - as the behaviour of the moons of Jupiter was an anomaly recognised by Galileo (and before him Copernicus) that challenged the predictive consistency of the Ptolemaic Paradigm (geocentrism). The Covid event marks the cusp of a shift from the viral paradigm to whatever is the emerging explanation for diseases and their spread. We await another key paper on what may be a new way of understanding disease- but where amid the disciples of the 'normal science' do you find peers to review and pass it for publication? How do you get the new paradigm past the 'inquisition'?
Exactly, Simon. Paradigm shifts never happen because the establishment concedes—they happen when the anomalies pile up and can no longer be ignored. Virology is in its “epicycle” phase now, tacking on explanations that grow more convoluted the deeper you look.
The beauty of invoking Kuhn here is that he reminds us: it’s not facts that change minds—it’s frameworks collapsing under their own contradictions. And COVID may well be the telescope moment.
Appreciate your comment—it’s refreshing to see this level of philosophical depth in the discussion.
Yes yes yes! As you well know, the telescope that Galileo made was a means of seeing empirical evidence for his theorising. I find it fascinating that though the 'paradigm shift' from a geo- to helio- centric view is painted as highly, and only, oppositional, in fact the most exciting work from which that famous 17th century shift emerged, entailed lively, respectful and friendly disputation between scholars who enjoyed each other's company. At a distance from the conversation of people who loved science there was, of course, intense polarisation. Church, state and popular opinion were shaken to the core by rumours of a new and 'crazy' idea. That public conflict, notoriously, reached Galileo via the Church, even though senior theologists had been intimately involved in discussion of the new ideas - in private! I like to think that whether it's germ theory versus - say - terrain theory or virology versus some as yet unseen set of propositions, the truth will emerge among people who are not at each other's throats, but sincerely excited by the advancing of human knowledge about the nature of disease. https://thonyc.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/refusing-to-look/
Beautifully said, Simon. You’re absolutely right—the real paradigm shifts often begin not with public combat but with quiet, curious minds debating in good faith. The image of Galileo battling dogma is powerful, but as you note, it was also shaped by friendly inquiry behind the scenes—until power structures felt threatened.
That’s what I hope for too: that those questioning the viral model or proposing terrain-based alternatives don’t get cast as heretics but welcomed into a conversation about how we really come to know. Because if truth emerges anywhere, it’s likely in those honest, energized spaces between conflicting ideas—not in the shouting match, but in the “what if?” rooms.
Thanks for the link—looking forward to digging in.
Enjoyed this post and the comments! My Energy Med post support Parasites as producing poison the central nervous system and cause hormonal deficiencies or imbalances and both environmental/manmade Poisons/Toxins result in cancer, HiV, Polio etc. Natural Medicine / Naturopathic Doctors / Trad. Chin. Med. Boil down all diseases as eventually a frequency based disruption.
Appreciate you weighing in, Dr. Hall. I’m not sure if you’re right, wrong, or somewhere in between—but it’s interesting how different frameworks (parasites, toxins, frequency disruptions) all try to explain what the virus model papered over with vague imagery and genetic code.
If we drop the viral paradigm, then yeah—we’re left with a lot of “what is making people sick?” questions. Could be terrain, toxicity, energetics, or some blend. But the key thing is: at least now we’re asking instead of chanting “pathogen did it” on cue.
Would be curious to hear what kind of clinical outcomes you’ve seen in practice with this frequency-based approach.
Not large study for my work only small “country free Clinic” practice. The TCM and Rife freq world, along with homeopathy, have years of background however, Not Expecting nor predicting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster‐RCTs, screening at entry ports, isolation, quarantine, physical distancing, personal protection, hand hygiene, face masks, glasses, and gargling as to prevent respiratory virus transmission.
Placebo IS an intervention … maybe interspersed with “water and placebo” success in an Indian prison by incarcerated doctor. Fereydoon Batmanghelidj, M.D., an internationally renowned researcher, author and advocate of the natural healing power of water, was born in Iran in 1931.
Long ago (60’s) I lauded the results vs the predicted outcomes, etc. and relied upon thousands of years of TCM. We now see the Rockefeller petro based “medicines” along with iatropic disasters vs the condemned medical “home brew - hoax” regime
I have a copy of The Essential Guide to Water and Salt by Day, Phillip (2008) which references Fereydoon Batmanghelidj which I found very interesting.
Interesting point, Dr. Hall. Are you saying that placebo itself can act like a real treatment—that belief and expectation have healing power?
I’m also curious what you meant by “iatropic disasters.” Do you mean harms caused by modern medicine?
Would love to hear more about how you see the difference between the “home brew” remedies and today’s pharmaceutical model.
Thanks, Dr. Hall. I get where you’re coming from—many of the most interesting approaches don’t fit into the RCT model, and maybe never will. That said, it does raise a tough question: how do we separate genuine healing from placebo or practitioner influence when we move outside traditional trial structures?
Not saying it disqualifies your methods—just wondering how we build credibility for non-conventional systems without adopting the same flawed machinery that props up the viral paradigm.
Would be curious how you approach that balance in your clinic.
There are many vectors for causation, but the imbalance is the common underlying issue.
I HAVE CALLED VIRUSES " AN IDEA" , WHICH ALLOWS BIG PHARMA TO INDUCE FEAR, PUSH DRUGS AND VACCINES ON POPULATION AND MAKE A HUGE PROFIT. A GREAT BUSINESS MODEL!
Control is the point. They have the protection magic, and you do not. To get the magic from them, you must do what they say when they say it.
If the herd magic did not work, then someone did not get the magic, or the magic would have worked. Herd magic protection is only achieved if everyone does it. The fact that it did not work means someone did not do it, or everyone would have been protected. But the magic only works if everyone in theory doe does it, or it might fail, not the magics fault; the lack of participation is the problem.
Have you seen the trick yet?
That's great! LOL
Thanks
Yes—classic conditional sorcery. The spell only works if everyone believes in it, and if it fails, that just proves someone broke the chant. It’s theological thinking dressed up in lab coats.
They’ve replaced falsifiability with faith, and public health has become a priesthood.
Of course I’ve seen the trick. The question is—how many more need to fall for it before the whole congregation walks out?
Winning hearts and minds is our mission. Soldier on my friend. Keep up the good work.
Say you look over your horse in search of maggots: You won't find any. Now shoot your horse, leave its carcass where it fell and return in a week. You'll find maggots and other insects, feeding on and dispatching the rotting carcass. The maggots show up when tissues decompose, not when tissues are alive and well.
I am pretty sure it is the same with bacteria and fungi. When tissues break down from injury or illness, they show up immediately, rain or shine--even on federal holidays. Their natural function is to break down and get rid of decomposition toxins and to recycle re-usable substances in service to life.
No bacterium has ever been shown to cause disease, because none could be demonstrated to fulfill Koch's Postulates--not even the first postulate. They could find some particular bacterium associating with sick people exhibiting symptoms of some "disease", but not every time. There are always numerous "cases" in which some bacterium suspected of causation was not present. Also the suspect would show up in well people, and so forth.
If bacteria caused illness, this would be easy to prove. No one has ever done so. Do I know this? No, I haven't done a deep dive, just a shallow one. But others have and this is what they've reported.
Anorexic bacteria produce toxic waste products that make people sick. People who ger root canal procedures in dentistry very often eventually fall iIl to heart disease, Parkinson's disease, cancer and other. The miles and miles of tubles in dead teeth host billions and billions of anorexic bacteria.
Good article! Thanks!
I like the idea of anorexic bacteria! I think you meant anaerobic bacteria?
yes thanks
Thanks, Rider! That’s a terrific analogy—nature’s cleanup crew doesn’t show up for a job that doesn’t exist. And yes, you're spot-on about Koch’s Postulates. If bacteria were truly the cause of disease, rather than opportunists feasting on already-compromised tissue, we’d have clear, reproducible proof by now. But we don’t.
Also appreciate you bringing up the root canal angle—Weston Price was onto that a century ago, but mainstream dentistry still treats it like fringe theory. The deeper folks dig, the more germ theory looks like a rotting paradigm in desperate need of composting.
Excellent.
TERRAIN VS. GERMS THEORIES. DIG DEEPER.