🦢 Bacteria vs. Viruses

Why One Is Proven and the Other Is Just Assumed

The Short Version:

• Bacteria are real. You can see them, grow them, isolate them, and test their effects.

• Viruses? Never seen in action, never isolated in pure form, and never directly shown to cause illness. Their existence is based on indirect effects and computer modeling—not observation.

---

🦠 Bacteria: Seen, Isolated, Tested

Bacteria are single-celled living organisms. They have their own DNA, reproduce on their own, and perform metabolic functions like consuming nutrients and excreting waste. Some bacteria can cause disease, but many are harmless or even essential for life (like those in your digestive system).

And most importantly:

• You can see bacteria under a regular light microscope.

• You can grow them on a petri dish and isolate one specific type.

• You can introduce that isolated bacterium into a host, see it cause disease, and then kill it with antibiotics.

• It's the classic scientific method: observe, isolate, replicate, treat.

Case closed.

---

🧬 Viruses: Inferred, Not Proven

• You can’t see viruses under a regular microscope. Electron microscopes show tiny particles—but nothing alive, nothing in action.

• Virologists never isolate viruses directly from the fluids of sick people. Instead, they:

  1. Mix a patient sample with toxic antibiotics and monkey kidney cells.

  2. Watch the cells die.

  3. Claim a virus caused it.

• They don’t extract a full, intact virus from this mess. Instead, they assemble “genomes” by stitching together fragments of genetic material using computer software. That’s modeling, not finding.

---

🧠 Voices Challenging the Narrative

🧪 Dr. Stefan Lanka:

“No pathogenic virus has ever been isolated or photographed in its entirety, directly from the bodily fluids of a sick person.”

“What they call isolation is actually a destruction process in a poisoned cell culture. They never isolate anything in the real sense of the word.”

“Genetic sequences are stitched together by computer programs from bits of genetic debris. No actual genome of a virus has been taken from a purified particle.”

👩‍⚕️ Dr. Sam Bailey:

“Virologists never isolate a virus the way a bacteriologist would isolate a bacterium. Instead, they create a cytopathic effect in a cell culture and declare the presence of a virus—without direct evidence.”

“If viruses existed as distinct, infectious particles, why can’t we find them in the fluids of sick people without blending it into a toxic cell soup?”

“Virology has become a belief system. The entire structure rests on circular reasoning, where virus existence is never actually proven, just assumed.”

🧬 Dr. Andrew Kaufman:

“No virus has ever been proven to cause a disease using proper scientific controls. The Koch’s postulates and the modern equivalents have never been fulfilled for any alleged virus.”

“What we see under the electron microscope are exosomes or cellular particles—normal components of healing—not invaders.”

---

🌟 Bottom Line:

• Bacteria can be isolated and tested—you don’t need a belief system to prove they exist.

• Viruses are pieced together from assumptions, indirect effects, and digital reconstructions.

You can catch bacteria red-handed.
With viruses, you’re looking at a chalk outline and trusting a lab tech with a story.

---

Final Thought:

If this sounds hard to believe, that’s understandable. The viral model has been repeated so often, most people assume it must be based on hard proof. But when you dig into the actual methods, the entire structure looks more like storytelling than science.

The good news? You don’t need to take anyone’s word for it. Go look at the source papers, examine the methods, and follow the trail yourself. Because in science, belief should never replace evidence.