Jon Rappoport recently argued that the concept of "gain of function"—or "gain of fiction," as some critics have dubbed it—is a dead end when it comes to holding Fauci and other proponents of the mainstream Covid narrative accountable for their actions.
I agree. The issue with "gain of function," defined by some as the process of "capturing viruses and making them more deadly, more transmissible, transmissible to humans," is that the very idea of viruses is a deception.
Whether you believe viruses are inherently pathogenic or that they can be engineered in a lab by malicious actors is irrelevant. The true deception lies in the concept of the "virus" itself, which has duped the public into believing they need "protection" from an invisible threat sanctioned by public health authorities.
Once you accept the idea that viruses are pathogenic, you inevitably become dependent on the mainstream medical authorities who claim to have discovered the "cure" in the form of the mRNA vaccine.
By endorsing "gain of function," you are playing by the rules set by the mainstream medical and scientific community, accepting their premise that these "viruses" are the cause of widespread illness, which they have conveniently labeled a "pandemic."
The notion of gain of function grants figures like Fauci more credit than they deserve. At its core, the belief in viruses as pathogenic agents is modern-day idolatry. Fauci and his followers are akin to religious fanatics, convinced they are on a crusade to save humanity, rather than acknowledging the potential for developing a weapon to harm people.
In this sense, they are more dangerous than a handful of Machiavellian actors who are fully aware that the vaccines are causing widespread injury and death—most likely some of the executives at pharmaceutical companies.
The propaganda campaign to convince people that they must be "protected" through vaccination dates back to the 1950s when "scientists" deceived the public into believing that polio was caused by a deadly "virus."
When FDR contracted polio in 1921, serious cases of "polio" were diagnosed based on the most severe symptom: paralysis. In 1960, the WHO redefined polio as a specific disease caused by a specific virus, requiring two stool samples with "poliovirus" present for diagnosis.
Even though the symptoms of paralysis remained virtually identical, cases without poliovirus were reclassified as acute flaccid paralysis.
A similar game is being played with Covid. The symptoms mirror those of any other respiratory illness, varying only in severity. Yet, the "experts" insist that Covid's symptoms are distinct, much like how paralytic polio was arbitrarily distinguished from other similar paralytic conditions.
The belief in a single virus causing a specific disease imbues sub-microscopic particles with human-like qualities. People are drawn to a simplistic, "one trick pony" explanation for their illness rather than accepting that multiple factors could contribute to their infirmity.
Once driven by fear, people feel they have no choice but to follow those who claim they can save them. Ironically, taking the "cure" may be the first step toward the collapse of their immune system.
Watch the sad One Trick Pony or listen to it on Soundcloud.
I don't believe it came from a bat. I don't believe it came from a lab. I give probabilities approaching 100% that it came from a psychopath's mind and infected many other minds. It's fictional through and through. Haha!
Thanks for this!
It’s so nice to find a fellow human that can think!
Great song, too.